Wednesday, 20 November 2024

SUDAN: Tigray official urges ceasefire as rebels enter regional capital


Members of Amhara region militias ride on a truck as they head to face the TPLF, in Sanja, Amhara region near a border with Tigray, on November 9, 2020 – (Reuters photo)


June 28, 2021 (MEKELLE) – An official of the State Interim Administration of Ethiopia’s Tigray region has called for ceasefire as Tigrayan fighters began entering the regional capital, Mekelle.

On Monday, rebel fighters better known as Tigray Defence Forces started advancing Mekelle after Ethiopian government troops retreated from the regional city.

Thousands of residents, New York Times reported, took to the streets on Monday night, waving flags and shooting off fireworks after hearing that Tigrayan forces had advanced to the city.

The Ethiopian national army had occupied the Tigray region since last November, after invading in cooperation with Eritrean and militia forces to take full control from the regional government.

But the Tigray Interim Administration Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Abraham Belay has called for ceasefire in the northern region in the light of the upcoming rainy season agricultural activities.

The ceasefire, he said, seeks to facilitate a conducive environment for the agricultural activities and ongoing humanitarian activities in the region.

The decision for the call of the ceasefire came after continuous consultations were conducted with representatives of the communities in the region, regional and zonal officials and scholars of the region and inventors and other segments of societies originating from Tigray, said Belay.

“Some factions of the terrorist TPLF [Popular Struggle for the Freedom of Tigray] have shown interest to resort to peaceful settlement of the problem in the region,” he stressed.

In recent weeks, the Tigray Defense Forces have reportedly captured areas south of Mekelle that were held by Ethiopian forces or militias allied with them.

Meanwhile, refugees and international observers have accused the invading forces of wide-ranging atrocities, including ethnic cleansing, and of pushing the region to the brink of famine.

SOURCE:

SUDAN: SPLM-N reiterates its call for talks on technical issues before vaccination campaign

October 28, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) reiterated its demand for talks on the technical details with the Sudanese government before to conduct a polio vaccination campaign UN agencies intend to launch during the first week of November.

Children sit in a cave shelter in Bram village in the Nuba Mountains, South Kordofan on 28 April 2012 (Photo: Reuters /Goran Tomasevic)
Children sit in a cave shelter in Bram village in the Nuba Mountains, South Kordofan on 28 April 2012 (Photo: Reuters /Goran Tomasevic)
Earlier this month Sudan and the members of the tripartite humanitarian initiative – UN agencies: WHO and UNICEF, African Union and Arab League – agreed with Khartoum to carry out the immunisation campaign on 5 November . Also, the Sudanese army announced a two-week cessation of hostilities for this period.

Khartoum turned down a demand by the SPLM-N to discuss the duration of the humanitarian truce and the actors involved in the operation. The rebels reject the presence of aid workers from the Sudanese Humanitarian Aid Commission (HAC) suspecting it of being infiltrated by intelligence agent and proposed that the UNISFA transport the vaccines.

SPLM-N secretary-general and top negotiator, Yasir Arman, on Monday disclosed that the group’s leader Malik Agar, in a letter sent to the head of the African Union mediation Thabo Mbeki, renewed their commitment to the campaign and readiness for talks “on the two issues that are hanging for the polio campaign to start as scheduled”.

“Mainly, a credible cessation of hostilities that the two parties are committed to during the duration of the vaccination campaign. Secondly, who is going to bring the vaccinations into the SPLM-N controlled areas”, Arman further pointed out in a statement he emailed to Sudan Tribune.

He emphasized that if the cessation of hostilities is mediated by the African mediation it would be more reliable and push the civilians to trust it and come out from the caves with their children to vaccinate them.

He further reminded that the UN Security Council had called in a press statement released on 10 October on the two parties to “resolve the technical plans necessary” for the vaccination campaign.

The chief negotiator implicitly rejected any role to the tripartite mechanism in this campaign, stressing they suggested since last September to the UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Sudan to involve “the AUHIP and the Chair of IGAD, the Ethiopian Prime Minister, as they are the only one tasked by UNSC Resolution 2046 and the subsequent resolutions by the African Union to handle the humanitarian issues in Sudan”.

Last year, in order to convince the Sudanese government to accept the distribution of humanitarian assistance in the rebel areas, the UN invited the Arab League and the African Union to send observers to monitor the food distribution. The measure aimed to dissipate Khartoum fears and to ensure that rebels would not benefit from the aid.

Sudan and SPLM signed a humanitarian agreement providing to allow humanitarian access to the rebel controlled areas on 4 August 2012 negotiated by the tripartite committee separately with the two parties but the two parties failed to implement it.

SOURCE:

SUDAN: The US will not lift sanctions while Darfur conflict continues: American delegation

 By Julie Flint, The Daily Star

LONDON, Feb 19, 2004 — For the last 12 months, peace talks to end 21 years of civil war between the government of Sudan and the southern rebels of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) have ground on with little or no care for a new war in Darfur on Sudan’s western border. But now, with thousands of civilians killed in Darfur, over a million displaced and hundreds of villages destroyed, the Sudan government has reportedly been told: Call off your troops and militias in the west, or expect no peace dividend for an agreement with the south.

US State Department sources say this was the message carried to Khartoum last week by a high-level American delegation headed by Charles Snyder, acting assistant secretary of state for African affairs. Snyder reportedly warned Khartoum that the US would not lift sanctions against Sudan, and the “troika” mediating the north-south talks the US, Britain and Norway would not fund a new era of peace with the SPLA as long as the war in Darfur rages unabated.

If confirmed, and if translated into meaningful pressure at the north-south talks that resumed in the Kenyan town of Naivasha on Tuesday, the new tough line with Khartoum may mark the end of a year in which the US administration turned a blind eye to the war in Darfur in its eagerness to score a foreign policy success in the south.

As Washington persisted in ignoring the conflict in Darfur, a region that is overwhelmingly Muslim, UN Undersecretary-General Jan Egeland warned last month that the crisis there probably comprises “the worst humanitarian crisis in the world” today. The UN estimates that half the population of Darfur is now “war-affected.” A million people are internally displaced, deprived of any humanitarian relief thanks to a one-two punch of deepening insecurity and government restrictions on relief. Another 110,000 have crossed the 1,350-kilometer border into Chad and are camped in precarious conditions in dangerous proximity to the border.

Relief workers say the vast majority of the refugees are farmers of African origin who have seen their villages and crops burned and their animals looted and killed by Arab militias, or Janjawiid, supported by the regular Sudanese Army.

UN relief agencies this week began an emergency airlift of 256 tons of aid to the border area, warning that the refugees stranded there are facing a “catastrophe.” The UN estimates 40 percent of the refugees are children under five and about 75 percent of the adults are women. Many are suffering from diarrhea and respiratory infections made worse by huge swings in temperature from scorching by day to near-freezing by night. Some of the refugees have been attacked, and their few belongings looted, by militias crossing the border with apparent impunity. Others have been bombed by Sudanese planes violating Chad’s airspace.

The Sudan government has consistently sought to downplay the conflict in Darfur, blaming it on “tribal clashes” and “banditry” despite abundant evidence of its own increasing involvement both through the regular army and air force and through the Janjawiid. Last week, for example, President Omar al-Bashir claimed the conflict in Darfur was over; this week, Amnesty International said it continues to receive “details of horrifying attacks against civilians in villages by government warplanes, soldiers and government-aligned militia.”

“The notion that restraint in speaking about the massive crisis in Darfur helps diplomacy in Naivasha is remarkably foolish,” says Sudan analyst Eric Reeves. “Khartoum sees only an incentive to prolong the ‘climactic moment’ at Naivasha as long as possible, thereby expanding the window of opportunity in which it can attempt to crush militarily the Darfur insurgency.”

An independent sultanate until 1917, when it was the last region to be incorporated into Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, Darfur is one of Sudan’s most neglected regions with a long history of resource conflict between Arab nomads and settled African farmers. This conflict was controlled and kept within limits by indigenous peace-making mechanisms until the 1980s, when a regional government was established in Darfur, the traditional “native administration” system based on village sheikhs was dismantled, and competition for political influence took on an ethnic color aggravated by the decision of the then prime minister, Sadiq al-Mahdi, to arm Arab militias.

At the same time, drought and desertification encouraged a more systematic drive by Arab nomads to occupy land in the central Jebel Marra massif, Darfur’s most fertile land. Hundreds of villages belonging to the Fur tribe, the largest African tribe in the region, were destroyed and thousands of lives were lost on both sides.

In February 2003, a new element was injected into the Darfur equation when the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) took up arms to protest the marginalization of Darfur in general and its African tribes in particular. The rebellion by the Fur-dominated SLA placed Darfur’s national agenda in the hands of leaders from Darfur for the first time and, despite espousing a secular agenda, surprised observers by winning widespread support. A string of military victories soon encouraged the formation of a second, overtly Islamic rebel movement the Justice and Equality Movement.

Although the relationship between the two rebel groups is not yet clear, there are indications that they are, for the moment at least, cooperating in many parts of Darfur. Unable to defeat the rebels on their own ground, relief workers and human rights groups say Khartoum adopted a strategy of attacking civilian targets through the Janjawiid, backed by the regular army and air force helicopter gunships and Antonov bombers. “The Janjawiid militia is reportedly the single major source of destruction and abuse,” says Alex de Waal of Justice Africa. “The government of Sudan’s armed forces were unable to cope with the Chadian-style highly mobile landcruiser-based raids of the SLA. In this context, its only hope for effective counter-insurgency is to try to clear the population itself. There is plentiful evidence of government of Sudan involvement in the planning and implementation of the Janjawiid attacks. Any denials by the government carry no credibility at all. It cannot claim ignorance.”

The deepening crisis in Darfur has been paralleled by major but as yet inconclusive advances in the north-south talks in Kenya: in 2002, a breakthrough agreement granting the south the right to self-determination after a six-year transition period; in September 2003, a deal on transitional security under which the government would withdraw its troops from the south; most recently, agreement on a 50-50 split of the nation’s wealth most importantly, its oil wealth.

Still to be resolved are the status of three disputed front-line areas Abyei, the Nuba Mountains and Southern Blue Nile and the division of political and administrative power. This round of talks should make clear whether the government is negotiating in good faith or, as many fear, simply playing for time in hope of winning the war in the west.

Julie Flint is a veteran Middle East reporter based in Beirut and London

SOURCE:

SUDAN: Sudan president underlines rejection of UN Darfur peacekeepers

March 28, 2007 (RIYADH) — Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir Wednesday underlined his rejection of U.N. peacekeepers in the war-torn Darfur region, saying the U.N. should only provide financial and technical help to African peacekeepers.

Al-Bashir made the comments in an opening speech to an Arab summit in the Saudi capital, attended by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is hoping to meet the Sudanese president in an attempt to convince him to accept peacekeepers.

But al-Bashir said U.N. resolutions calling for a U.N. deployment in Darfur were “a violation for Sudan’s sovereignty” and “provoke the conflict in Darfur, instead of finding a solution for it.”

“We assure you that we do not desire a confrontation with the international community, but what we are seeking is to keep the African color of the forces in Darfur according to the shape and leadership, but on condition that the U.N. will take over the financial, technical and logistic support for those forces,” he said.

Al-Bashir said the U.N. should step up efforts to negotiate a political settlement in Darfur.

Some 70,000 African Union peacekeepers have been unable to put an end to escalating violence in Darfur, where government forces and ethnic African rebels have been battling for nearly four years.

Al-Bashir’s government is accused of backing Arab janjaweed militiamen blamed for widespread atrocities against ethnic African civilians. More than 200,000 people have been killed and more than 2.5 million driven from their homes.

SOURCE:

SUDAN: Sudan-Chad border troops to be deployed in January

 November 16, 2008 (NDJAMENA) — The deployment of 2000 troops from Sudan and Chad along th joint border could intervene next January, said the Congo Republic Foreign Minister Basile Ikouebe Sunday.

Alor_with_Deby.jpgForeign ministers of Dakar contact group charged with improving relations between Sudan and Chad wrapped a two-day meeting in the Chadian capital, N’djamena today. The member of ce group are: Chad, Sudan, Libya, Gabon, Congo Republic, Senegal and Eritrea.


Congolese foreign minister told reporters on Sunday that the deployment of 1,000 Chadian soldiers and 1,000 Sudanese soldiers is expected to take place during the first month of 2009. He further said that the joint force would monitor the border to observe there are no movements to destabilise the stability in one of the two countries.

The meeting which was chaired by the Chadian foreign minister Moussa Faki Mahamat, adopted the border force budget. It amounts to twenty-one million U.S. dollars.

The 7th meeting which would be held in  Khartoum next January would finalize the establishment of the Observation Mission and the mechanism of troops’ deployment. Also, the meeting will define the duties of the general coordinator of the joint force.

Signed in March, the Dakar agreement, which is far from being the first peace agreement between Chad and Sudan, aimed for both countries to stop supporting proxy rebel fighters.

The agreement pledged to “prohibit any activity by armed groups and prevent the use of their respective territories for the destabilization of one or the other” in both countries.

SOURCE:

SUDAN: UAE warns of halting RSF support over El Fasher stalemate


An RSF vehicle destroyed outside El-Fasher by the Sudanes Army and allied groups on 10th August 2024. 

November 19, 2024 (N’DJAMENA) – The United Arab Emirates has warned the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) it may cut off support if the paramilitary group fails to seize control of El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, a source close to the Chadian presidency told Sudan Tribune.

Chad plays a key logistical and military support role for the RSF, allowing the use of its airports and border crossings.

El Fasher has been under RSF siege since May, with intense fighting but little change in territorial control.

The source said the RSF is seeking alternative support, including bartering gold for weapons via Nyala airport, which has recently increased activity. Reports indicate renewed activity at the Sengo gold mine in South Darfur.

Sudan Tribune could not independently confirm these claims.

The RSF has progressively gained control across much of Darfur. Government forces remain entrenched in El Fasher, having partially broken the siege. The city has seen the fiercest fighting, with the RSF suffering significant losses, including commander Ali Yaqoub, killed in June. Both sides continue to mobilize fighters.

Africa Intelligence, a French intelligence newsletter, reported the UAE plans to reduce spending of at least $2 billion allegedly used for RSF military and logistical support. UN experts and investigative reports allege the UAE has provided arms and logistical support to the RSF, accusations the Gulf state denies.

SUDAN: Burhan condemns NCP Shura Council meeting, warns against political moves

 

Al-Burhan speaks to Army officers on 13th April 2024 in Omdurman

November 19, 2024 (PORT SUDAN) – Sudan’s Sovereign Council head, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, on Tuesday denounced efforts to convene the Shura Council of the dissolved National Congress Party (NCP) as “regrettable and unacceptable.” He warned against political actions undermining national unity and the ongoing war effort.

At the opening of an economic conference organized by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, al-Burhan stated that he was closely monitoring the NCP’s attempts to hold Shura Council meetings.

“This action is regrettable and unacceptable to us,” al-Burhan declared. “We will not permit any opposing political activities that threaten the unity of the country and the fighters on the ground.”

He dismissed claims that some fighters supporting the army are affiliated with the NCP or any other political group, emphasizing that all those fighting are Sudanese citizens engaged in a national cause.

Al-Burhan urged a focus on supporting the army and postponing political activities until the war concludes and the rebels are defeated.

This statement follows a recent report by Sudan Tribune about internal divisions within the NCP regarding the Shura Council meeting, which aims to elect a new leader to succeed Ibrahim Mahmoud Hamid.

Shura Council Chairman Osman Kibir reportedly postponed the meeting to avoid further division, as factions within the party disagree on whether to retain Hamid or reinstate Ahmed Haroun as leader.

SOURCE: