Phillip Moi

When It Comes To Dealing With Women, Philip Moi Is A Living Legend!

Former President Moi’s son Philip is a legend as to how men should deal with manipulative and psychopathic women in your life. He married this Italian or whatever, she is woman called Pluda, and they had 2 kids.

But at some point, the two were dragged into a protracted divorce case, highly publicised by the feminist-dominated media, who derive immense pleasure at seeing a man brought down.

Pluda had hired predator Lawyer Judy Thongori to represent her. Predator lawyers are the women/feminists who’ve specialised in divorce cases, and they have operationalised the divorce industrial complex, to make cash from the inevitable conflict.

You see our current Justice system is designed to create conflict, but that conflict is rooted in the presumption that men are always at fault in it. This is why there can never be an equalist solution to correcting the endemic problems of modern divorce procedures.

Anything even remotely, positively masculine or Alpha is still a ‘man being a man’ and this can always be reinterpreted as potentially aggressive or violent. In a feminine-primary social order where feminized men and women are taught that men are inherently evil and prone to anger and violence (the “culture” of masculinity) there’s an army of women and White Knight sympathizing men who want nothing more than to stick it to the ‘man’ symbolically. And when they draw a paycheck from doing so they’re all the more eager.

Needless to say this will be the starting point from which a soon-to-be-divorced man will have his undoing begin. So prevalent is the presumption of abuse on a man’s part that even the most saintly father can be remade into a secret monster. It’s just ‘how guys are’ and this presumption also serves as a point of justification for women, and Blue Pill male sympathizers, to feel okay about projecting the man in this light.

However, all of the people involved in even a typical western divorce are all subject to the belief sets that the Feminine Imperative has predisposed them to about men and women. We presume a default state of victimhood is to be applied to a woman and the benefit of that victimhood doubt runs deep. We see it evolve into the kangaroo court systems that govern what we’re told to believe is an endemic ‘rape culture’ on college campuses – up to and beyond denying a man his civil rights.

We get well-conditioned attorneys, counsellors and judges ready to follow that same script by legally enacting the retribution and restitution upon which feminism has always been based.

It can all be traced back to the early 2000’s, when shadowy females like Supreme Court Judge Njoki Ndung’u rose from obscurity to be nominated member of parliament due to that gender-quota. She was long associated with former Internal Security Minister Dr. Chris Murungaru, but that didn’t matter. On the mainstream side of life, she was elevated and recognised by society as an influencer. Embassies were falling over themselves to reward her efforts, while UN made her “Person Of The Year”.

It is this thinking that saw Justice Luka Kimaru award Pluda a hefty settlement of Kshs. 90 million in cash, plus another 60 million to find her a house in either Kileleshwa, Lavington or Runda. The judge didn't bother to know who instigated the divorce. Or even if she was a drug addict/junkie. Or even more so that she was sleeping around. In the eyes of the public, the “monster” Philip had to be taught a lesson.

Philip sought temporary orders to stop Pluda from demanding the money from him. He had said the amount he was ordered to pay was beyond what Pluda used to access during the marriage. Philip claimed that despite knowing his true financial status, Pluda had decided to live a "life of fantasy, glamour and glitz, ostentation with a display of affluence fit for Hollywood and the legendary jet-setting lifestyle known worldwide for extravagance”.

He said he Pluda's "lavish lifestyle, which is not only extravagant but obscene, according to Kenyan standards”, had forced him to incur debt to maintain it.

Therein lies the message. Here is a President’s son, stating clearly that his wife is extravagant and living the life of a Slay-Queen. He refused to finance her contrived standards (despite the obvious fact that he had the money), because it's ridiculous for any grown man to blow cash like there's no tomorrow.

One dramatic court appearance saw Philip Moi appear in court, and telling the judge that he was broke and had no money. Even the little amount that the court prescribed, Philip totally refused to give her a dime. He said he was broke. The most hilarious part was his exit from the court-room, accompanied by a dozen Recce Squad officers. Broke indeed!

And fellows, that's how things are done. If Philip who is a multi-billionaire by any standards is safeguarding his cash from being blown by excesses of extravagance, who are you to imagine that these slay-queens won't give you grief?

Any woman who is encouraging you to spend on vanity shit is a ball-buster. She doesn't love you one bit.

This campaign to resist slay-queen pussy is not for the faint-hearted. It's a deliberate effort to reset intergender relations in this country. The “traitors” who are the blue-pill men who've been breast-fed on a steady diet of noble intent and indoctrinated with feminist ideology, should not deter anyone. They're the insignificant minority.

What did the boda-boda guy say? Let's nduthis!