By JOHN KAMAU
Posted Thursday, March 21 2013 at 19:50
Posted Thursday, March 21 2013 at 19:50
Warned that it might lose its strategic position, the UK government has said that it will not impose any sanctions on Kenya for electing Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto as President and Vice President—citing commercial, military and strategic reasons.The matter, which came out during a two-hour Kenya policy debate on Wednesday at the House of Commons, is the latest indicator of how London has reviewed its policy a few months after its Nairobi High Commission said it would maintain only “essential business” with a Mr Kenyatta government.Both Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto are facing crimes against humanity charges at the International Criminal Court.Like during the presidencies of Jomo Kenyatta, Daniel arap Moi and Mwai Kibaki, the presence of British companies, the country’s strategic position in eastern Africa, and the training of 10,000 British troops every year continues to inform the UK diplomatic relations with Kenya.
Parliament was also informed that UK’s total
trade exceeds £1 billion and exports rose by 38 per cent from 2010 to
2011 and that a substantial number of the largest taxpaying companies in
Kenya were from the UK.(Read: Sanctions would also hurt donor interests).Before Alistair Burt, a Parliamentary
Undersecretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs stated the
policy, members of parliament had voiced concerns that Kenya was an
important ally and that China had started to have a heavy commercial
and economic presence in Nairobi.“I had the opportunity of being in Kenya last
year, and China’s presence there was very apparent. China was deeply
involved in massive road building...We should be doing that sort of
construction work in Kenya.“No disrespect to the Chinese, but why are we not
there? ...we have many capable companies in the United Kingdom that
could be given the contracts to improve accessibility to clean water
right across Africa, and in particular in Kenya,” said Jim Shannon, a
Democratic Unionist Party MP.
In his reply Mr Burt said that “the UK had never
threatened sanctions against Kenya on this (election of Mr Kenyatta)
issue... The people of Kenya should not be arbitrarily punished for the
alleged crimes of their leaders.,” he said in a government statement.While last October, the British High Commissioner
to Kenya, Christian Turner, had warned in Nairobi that UK would only
maintain “essential” contacts should Mr Kenyatta and his running mate
get elected, the House of Commons was told that UK “will want to
continue working with the next Government in Kenya; ... continue helping
UK companies looking to invest in Kenya in support of Kenya’s Vision
2030; and to continue working together on security and stability in
Somalia.”
The clarification came as a former United States
Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Jendayi Frazer, said
the US and Europe were playing dangerous diplomatic games for their
delayed endorsement of Kenyatta’s presidency, warning that China was
going to fill that void.Already, the Chinese Ambassador to Kenya, Liu
Guangyuan and the Indian High Commissioner to Kenya Sibabrata Tripathi—
among other non-Western nations—have paid courtesy calls on the
President-elect whose election is being challenged by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord) led by Prime Minister Raila Odinga.“The geo-strategic environment has changed
entirely and particularly (in favour of) China. The Chinese have changed
the playing field (and) if the US, the UK and Europeans don’t want to
deal with Uhuru Kenyatta, he has another option,” Ms Frazer told a US
television station .In British Parliament, the mover of the Motion
told members that the evidence against Mr Kenyatta at the Hague came
from a “compromised” source and urged the government not to leave its
policy towards Kenya to be determined by “technicalities and
bureaucratic processes” in the Hague.
“While
the Minister cannot comment on the legal processes of the ICC, I simply
flag up to him that it would be unconscionable if, for a considerable
period, a cloud or a pall hung over the President of Kenya and the
Government of Kenya, and indeed our relationship with Kenya, which is of
such fundamental importance,” said Erik Joyce, an Independent and
former Labour Party MP.Another Member (Martin Horwood) told the House
that Kenya’s economic growth of five per cent makes it “potentially a
very valuable economic, trading and political partner for this country. I
think that we would all want to see a process whereby Kenya moved from
being an aid recipient.”The government said that the British Army trains
10,000 British soldiers in Kenya every year, “and we have an excellent,
long-standing relationship with the Kenyan armed forces and the local
communities surrounding the training areas.
jkamau@ke.nationmedia.com
No comments:
Post a Comment