By ISAAC ONGIRI iongiri@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Thursday, March 21 2013 at 00:30
Posted Thursday, March 21 2013 at 00:30
Newly-elected MPs who are coming to terms with realities of the recent pay cuts for legislators have started agitating for higher pay.
Expecting to earn the nearly Sh1 million pay per
month enjoyed by MPs in the last Parliament, lawmakers now realise that
their salary has been reduced to Sh532,500 a month.
Extreme pay cuts for new members by the Salaries
and Remunerations Commission has now sparked fresh salary review demands
as new legislators claim the rates are demeaning.
Four MPs-elect on Wednesday accused the SRC of
setting a salary regime that would put MPs in a compromising position
and make them miserable personalities and said they would lead demands
for fresh negotiations on salaries and allowances payable to MPs and
other elected leaders.
Mr Njoroge Baiyia (Githunguri), Mr Yusuf Chanzu
(Vihiga), Mr Oyugi Magwanga (Kasipul) and Mr Johanna Ng’eno (Emurwa
Dikkir ) told the Nation that reducing MPs salaries to as little as
Sh532,500 was unfair given their job description and that of other
constitutional office holders, whose perks remained high.
Job description
Besides cutting MPs’ pay, the previous privilege
that gave them access to a Sh3.3 million grant to buy a new car every
parliamentary term has also been replaced by a new scheme where the
legislators will be allowed access to a Sh7 million loan to be repaid
within their five-year term.
“It is unfortunate that the SRC had to take this
route. We are going to demand for a fresh review of all this. Even
though we agree that the previous salary needed to be scaled down, it
was important that several factors and job description of an MP be
considered in achieving that,” Mr Chanzu said.
He warned that most MPs, both first-timers and
those who were re-elected, were disappointed and called on the SRC to be
ready for further review to avoid being seen as belittling the work of
parliamentarians.
As set, MPs in the 11th Parliament could take home
Sh250,000 after deductions compared to their colleagues in the 10th
Parliament, who took home close to Sh650,000 after statutory deductions.
New MPs are more likely to suffer compared to
their re-elected colleagues, who are a bit more established and may
avoid unnecessary financial commitments.
Mr Ng’eno, who will represent the newly created
Emurwa Dikkir constituency, called for better pay for MPs, saying, the
area has no roads and has chronic poverty levels.
“In Emurwa Dikkir, the only permanent house is a
school house assigned to the Emurwa Dikkir High School principal,” Mr
Ng’eno said, adding that his workload would be huge.
Mr Baiyia accused the SRC of playing to the
gallery by “abnormally” scaling down MPs salaries. He said that the over
400 members of the national assembly and the senate would demand a
review of salaries for all elected leaders.
Said Mr Baiyia: “What the SRC did has turned the
work of elected leaders into a joke. We all agree that reviewing the
salaries and introducing taxes was important, but what they have come up
with is an insult.”
Mr Magwanga said MPs were not amused by the new
development and that they would be registering their displeasure to the
commission after next week’s swearing-in.
“We had so many people resigning to seek elective
positions even at the county level. We have doctors, lawyers, high
school teachers and people from other professions who resigned to
contest elective seats.
“It is sad that he SRC has decided to punish the
political class while keeping salaries for other constitutional officers
high without evaluating the workload involved. It may be too bad for
them at last,” he warned without elaborating.
The SRC in new salary scales published last week increased mortgage entitlements for MPs to Sh20 million payable at an annual interest rate of three per cent, but the burden would further lower MPs’ take-home.
The SRC in new salary scales published last week increased mortgage entitlements for MPs to Sh20 million payable at an annual interest rate of three per cent, but the burden would further lower MPs’ take-home.
No comments:
Post a Comment