By PETER LEFTIE pmutibo@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Wednesday, May 15 2013 at 23:38
Posted Wednesday, May 15 2013 at 23:38
Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji quizzed lawyer Karim Khan
over submissions that his client be permitted to skip trial as he had a
constitutional duty to serve the people of Kenya as deputy president.
Judge: Clarify your written submissions that Mr
Ruto is making this request given his unique position as Deputy
President. Did he not seek this position and got it, congratulations to
him though, fully aware of this case?
Mr Khan: Mr Ruto responded to the will of the people of Kenya to serve them and he was democratically elected to this office.
Judge: Did he seek this position before court proceedings commenced or after?
Khan: As a politician, it has been a long walk for Mr Ruto. It is a continuation of his public service but I think it was after.
When Mr Eboe-Osuji asked why Mr Ruto did not wait
to clear his name before running for election, Mr Khan said doing so
would have reinforced the perception that the ICC was being used by Mr
Ruto’s political adversaries to force him out of the race.
He said Mr Ruto was ready to attend trial whenever
required to do so and that he was not seeking a waiver to skip the
entire proceedings.
Mr Khan said Mr Ruto was the first serving deputy
president to present himself before the court, adding this was a
demonstration of his commitment to cooperate fully.
He dismissed the prosecution’s assertion that Mr
Ruto’s absence could be prejudicial to the victims. “There are no
victims in this court, they are represented by their counsel,” he
remarked.
Mr Eboe-Osuji also took prosecutor Cynthia Tai to task over the demand that Mr Ruto attends in person.
She had said the interests of witnesses and victims would be adversely affected if Mr Ruto was not physically present in court.
The court later went into a closed session to discuss the prosecutor’s complaints.
No comments:
Post a Comment