By DAVE OPIYO dopiyo@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Friday, April 26 2013 at 23:30
Posted Friday, April 26 2013 at 23:30
Mr Ruto, whose case at the International Criminal
Court was set to commence on May 28, has requested the Trial Chamber V
judges to set a new date “not earlier than November 2013”.
In a new application filed through lawyer Karim
Khan, the Deputy President made the request to enable his defence team
adequate time to conduct investigations necessary to properly prepare
for his trial.
Said Mr Khan in the application dated April 25:
“The Defence of Mr William Samoei Ruto respectfully requests the Trial
Chamber vacate the scheduled May 28, 2013 commencement date of trial.”
Mr Khan argued that the request arose from the
failure by Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to provide timely and effective
disclosure of witnesses.
He accused Ms Bensouda of failing to disclose the identity of one of her witnesses until April 17.
Ms Bensouda, added Mr Khan, further delayed until
the first week of April, the disclosure of audio records of interviews
of four of her witnesses amongst others.
“The OTP’s continued dilatory disclosure to the
Defence as well as its general approach to the prosecution of this case
has rendered the May 28 date absolutely unviable if the fair trial
rights of Mr Ruto are to be guaranteed,” said Mr Khan.
Mr Khan attempted to justify the rationale behind
their request arguing that the chamber had on March 8 this year
postponed the original trial commencement date of April 10 to May 28 “so
that the defence could continue its investigations”.
The lawyer said to date, Ms Bensouda had failed to
disclose the identity of witness P-0534 to the defence despite the fact
that the chamber had ordered that this be done by March 13.
“Accordingly, the Defence remains unable to review
the witness’s un-redacted statements and then plan and conduct
investigation into the witness.”
Ms Bensouda, in another submission to the court
dated April 25, admitted that she had not disclosed the identity of the
witness.
Meanwhile, the Trial Chamber judges at The Hague
have given the government 12 days to justify its cooperation with
investigations into the 2007/08 post-election violence.
The decision of the International Criminal Court
came as lawyers for post-election violence victims opposed a request by
Deputy President Ruto to be tried via video link.
Attorney-General Githu Muigai had written to the
court complaining that Ms Bensouda had repeatedly made claims that
Kenya had not been cooperating with her office.
In a detailed submission to the Trial Chamber V
dated April 8, the AG wanted the court to order that such complaints
against the government must be made “on notice” for them to have ample
time to respond.
However, on Wednesday, the Trial Chamber asked the
government to make its application and gave the parties to the two
cases 14 days to respond to the submissions once the filing was done.
“Given the desirability of fully understanding the
status of cooperation between organs of the Court and the Government of
Kenya, the Chamber considers it appropriate to grant it leave to file
observations on this issue and, further, to accept the submissions in
the application,” said the judges.
Use of video link
Common legal representative of the victims Wilfred
Nderitu said the use of video link was restricted to the pre-trial
stage of proceedings.
In a submission to the court, Mr Nderitu said
while the use of video link was available for a “witness or suspect” at
the pre-trial phase, the rules of procedure did not contain any
provisions for an “accused” person at the trial stage to waive his
rights to be present and substitute this right with the use of video
link.
In the submission obtained by the Saturday Nation on Friday, Mr Nderitu said: “There is no legal justification for the defence request for the use of video link.”
No comments:
Post a Comment